Gotnext Women's Basketball Boards

andypanda · Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 354 Location: Santa Fe, NM

I see one of the regulars has an excerpt from this list of gems in the footer of her posts. Here's a longer compilation.

What a guy.........

"The future will be better tomorrow."
- George W. Bush

"We're going to have the best educated American people in the world."
- George W. Bush

"I stand by all the misstatements that I've made."
- George W. Bush

"We have a firm commitment to NATO, we are a part of NATO. We have a firm commitment to Europe. We are a part of Europe."
- George W. Bush

"Public speaking is very easy."
- George W. Bush

"A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls."
- George W. Bush

"We are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur."
- George W. Bush

"For NASA, space is still a high priority."
- George W. Bush

"Quite frankly, teachers are the only profession that teach our children."
- George W. Bush

"It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the impurities in
our air and water that are doing it."
-George W. Bush

"It's time for the human race to enter the solar system."
- George W. Bush

Red · Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 32 Location: Glendale, AZ

Hooorah! I see we still have one small place where free speech about Bush is still allowed. :roll:

andypanda · Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 354 Location: Santa Fe, NM

We're sorry, but your praise cannot be passed on as written due to the extremely sudden passing of a constitutional amendment correcting the incidental mistake of allowing freedom of speech.

Please redact your statement and rephrase it in such a way that the Men In Black don't show up at your house in the morning.

Thank you for your anticipated co-operation, and remember ... we're your government and we're here to help ourselves to your swag.

Have a nice day, 3587-9415-98773.

andypanda · Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 354 Location: Santa Fe, NM

Red, I pass this along as one of the best writings I've found describing the difference between the war in Iraq and other wars, and the values embodied by this Presidency compared to others. In times like these, it's useful to remember that it is the *office* of the Presidency we must respect, not the person who holds the office. Someone looking for the answers as to why the United States has lost respect around the world under this administration need look no further than this passionately patriotic American hero.

Dissent at the War Memorial

As I write this, the sounds of the World War II Memorial celebration in Washington, D.C., are still in my head. I was invited by the Smithsonian Institution to be on one of the panels, and the person who called to invite me said that the theme would be "War Stories." I told him that I would come, but not to tell "war stories," rather to talk about World War II and its meaning for us today. Fine, he said.

I made my way into a scene that looked like a movie set for a Cecil B. DeMille extravaganza--huge tents pitched here and there, hawkers with souvenirs, thousands of visitors, many of them clearly World War II veterans, some in old uniforms, sporting military caps, wearing their medals. In the tent designated for my panel, I joined my fellow panellist, an African American woman who had served with the WACS (Women's Army Corps) in World War II, and who would speak about her personal experiences in a racially segregated army.

I was introduced as a veteran of the Army Air Corps, a bombardier who had flown combat missions over Europe in the last months of the war. I wasn't sure how this audience would react to what I had to say about the war, in that atmosphere of celebration, in the honouring of the dead, in the glow of a great victory accompanied by countless acts of military heroism.

This, roughly, is what I said: "I'm here to honour the two guys who were my closest buddies in the Air Corps--Joe Perry and Ed Plotkin, both of whom were killed in the last weeks of the war. And to honour all the others who died in that war. But I'm not here to honour war itself. I'm not here to honour the men in Washington who send the young to war. I'm certainly not here to honour those in authority who are now waging an immoral war in Iraq."

I went on: "World War II is not simply and purely a 'good war.' It was accompanied by too many atrocities on our side--too many bombings of civilian populations. There were too many betrayals of the principles for which the war was supposed to have been fought.

"Yes, World War II had a strong moral aspect to it--the defeat of fascism. But I deeply resent the way the so-called good war has been used to cast its glow over all the immoral wars we have fought in the past fifty years: in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan. I certainly don't want our government to use the triumphal excitement surrounding World War II to cover up the horrors now taking place in Iraq.

"I don't want to honour military heroism--that conceals too much death and suffering. I want to honour those who all these years have opposed the horror of war."

The audience applauded. But I wasn't sure what that meant. I knew I was going against the grain of orthodoxy, the romanticization of the war in movies and television and now in the war memorial celebrations in the nation's capital.

There was a question-and-answer period. The first person to walk up front was a veteran of World War II, wearing parts of his old uniform. He spoke into the microphone: "I was wounded in World War II and have a Purple Heart to show for it. If President Bush were here right now I would throw that medal in his face."

There was a moment of what I think was shock at the force of his statement. Then applause. I wondered if I was seeing a phenomenon that recurs often in society--when one voice speaks out against the conventional wisdom, and is recognized as speaking truth, people are drawn out of their previous silence.

I was encouraged by the thought that it is possible to challenge the standard glorification of the Second World War, and more important, to refuse to allow it to give war a good name. I did not want this celebration to make it easy for the American public to accept whatever monstrous adventure is cooked up by the establishment in Washington.

More and more, I am finding that I am not the only veteran of World War II who refuses to be corralled into justifying the wars of today, drawing on the emotional and moral capital of World War II. There are other veterans who do not want to overlook the moral complexity of World War II: the imperial intentions of the Allies even as they declared it a war against fascism, and for democracy; the deliberate bombing of civilian populations to destroy the morale of the enemy.

Paul Fussell was an infantry lieutenant who was badly wounded while a platoon leader in France in World War II.

"For the past fifty years the Allied war has been sanitized and romanticized almost beyond recognition by the sentimental, the loony patriotic, the ignorant, and the bloodthirsty," he wrote in Wartime.

It was easier, after the end of World War II, to point to its stupidities and cruelties in fiction rather than in a direct onslaught on what was so universally acclaimed as "the good war." Thus, Joseph Heller in Catch-22 captured the idiocy of military life, the crass profiteering, the pointless bombings. And Kurt Vonnegut, in Slaughterhouse-Five, brought to a large readership the awful story of the bombing of Dresden.

My own delayed criticism of the war--I had volunteered and was an enthusiastic bombardier--began with reflecting about my participation in the bombing of Royan. This was a small town on the Atlantic coast of France, where several thousand German soldiers had been overrun and were waiting for the war to end. Twelve hundred heavy bombers flew over the vicinity of Royan and dropped napalm, killing German soldiers and French civilians, destroying what was once a beautiful little resort town.

Recently, a man wrote to me who had heard me speak on the radio about that bombing mission and said he was also on that mission. After the war, he became a fireman, then a carpenter, and is now a strong opponent of war. He told me of a friend of his who was also on that mission, and who has been arrested many times in anti-war actions. I was encouraged to hear that.

World War II veterans get in touch with me from time to time. One is Edward Wood Jr. of Denver, who upon hearing I was going to be at the Washington Memorial, wrote to me: He said, "If I were there, I would say: As a combat veteran of World War II, severely wounded in France in 1944, never the man I might have been because of that wound, I so wish that this memorial to World War II might have been made of more than stone or marble. I mourn my generation's failures since its victory in World War II . . . our legacy of incessant warfare in smaller nations far from our borders."

Another airman, Ken Norwood, was shot down on his tenth mission over Europe, and spent a year as a prisoner of war in Germany. He has written a memoir (unpublished, so far) which he says is "intentionally an anti-war war story." Packed first into a box car, and then forced to march for two weeks through Bavaria in the spring of 1945, Norwood saw the mangled corpses of the victims of Allied bombs, the working class neighborhoods destroyed. All his experiences, he says, "add to the harsh testimony about the futility and obscenity of war."

The glorification of the "good war" persists on our television and movie screens, in the press, in the pretentious speeches by politicians. The more ugly the stories that come out of Iraq--the bombing of civilians, the mutilation of children, the invasion of homes, and now the torture of prisoners--the more urgent it is for our government to try to crowd out all those images with the triumphant stories of D-Day and World War II.

Those who fought in that war are perhaps better able than anyone to insist that whatever moral standing can be attached to that war must not be used to turn our eyes away from Bush's atrocities in Afghanistan and Iraq.

-- Howard Zinn, the author of "A People's History of the United States," is a columnist for The Progressive.

1carol · Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Posts: 1049 Location: Phoenix AZ

AP, Thanks for printing that powerful editorial. Also for reminding me that in times like these the *Office* of the Presidency" is due our respect. The men come & go. I hope this one goes soon since if I feel he's abused the honor & priveledge of power he's been trusted with.

Red · Joined: 14 Jun 2002 Posts: 32 Location: Glendale, AZ

AP~

Thanks so much for posting that wonderful editorial. I fear we are at a very pivotal point in this country at which our democracy and freedoms hang in the balance. This is definitely not a time for apathy.

I pray the white house and our system of checks and balances will be restored once again to the people of our wonderful country.

caune · Joined: 12 Jun 2002 Posts: 1562 Location: Phoenix

That was a great editorial ....as opposed to this lovely piece that USA Today had commisioned but refused to publish, written by Ann Coulter...
And yet all that "Bush Bashing" seems to be the big problem according to republicans :roll:

Quote: Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston, conservatives are deploying a series of covert signals to identify one another, much like gay men do. My allies are the ones wearing crosses or American flags. The people sporting shirts emblazened with the "F-word" are my opponents. Also, as always, the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling.

Democrats are constantly suing and slandering police as violent, fascist racists -- with the exception of Boston's police, who'll be lauded as national heroes right up until the Democrats pack up and leave town on Friday, whereupon they'll revert to their natural state of being fascist, racist pigs.

A speaker at the Democratic National Convention this year, Al Sharpton, accused white police officers of raping and defacing Tawana Brawley in 1987, lunatic charges that eventually led to a defamation lawsuit against Sharpton and even more eventually, to Sharpton paying a jury award to the defamed plaintiff Steve Pagones. So it's a real mystery why cops wouldn't like Democrats.

As for the pretty girls, I can only guess that it's because liberal boys never try to make a move on you without the UN Security Council's approval. Plus, it's no fun riding around in those dinky little hybrid cars. My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic National Convention.

Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall. Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in W.W.F. caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone".

I thought this was a great idea until I realized the nut category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Teddy Kennedy -- all featured speakers at the convention. I'd say the actual policy is only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too. So it must be cages for nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party.

Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We'll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he'll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them.

For 20 years, the Democrats wouldn't let Jimmy Carter within 100 miles of a Convention podium. The fact that Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where that party is today. Maybe they just want to remind Americans who got us into this Middle East mess in the first place. W've got millions of fanatical Muslims trying to slaughter Americans while shouting Allah Akbar! Yeah, let's turn the nation over to these guys.

With any luck, Gore will uncork his speech comparing Republicans to Nazis. Just a few weeks ago, Gore gave a speech accusing the Bush administration of deploying digital "Brown Shirts" to intimidate journalists and pressure the media into writing good things about Bush -- in case you were wondering where all those glowing articles about Bush were coming from.

The last former government official to slake his thirst so deeply with the kool-aid and become a far-left peacenik was Ramsey Clarke and it took him a few years to really blossom. Clinton must have done some number on Gore. Then again, with his yen for earth tones in a man's wardrobe, maybe Gore's references to "Brown Shirts" was intended as a compliment.

Only one major newspaper -- the Boston Herald -- reported Gore's Brown Shirt comment, though a Bush campaign spokesman's statement quoting the "Brown Shirt" line made it into the very last sentence of a Los Angeles Times article. The New York Times responded with an article criticizing both Republicans and Democrats for using Nazi imagery. Democrats call Republicans Nazis, the Republicans quote the Democrats calling Republicans Nazis and both are using Nazi imagery. (It's a cycle of violence!)

The nuts in the cages are virtual Bertrand Russells compared to the official speakers at the Democratic Convention. On the basis of their placards, I gather the caged-nut position is that they love the troops so much, they don't want them to get hurt defending America from terrorist attack. Support the troops, the signs say, bring them home.

That's my new position on all government workers, except the 5% who aren't useless, which is to say cops, prosecutors, firemen and U.S. servicemen. I love bureaucrats at the National Endowment of the Arts funding crucifixes submerged in urine so much -- I think they should go home. I love public school teachers punishing any mention of God and banning Christmas songs so much -- I think they should go home.

Walking back from the convention site I chatted with a normal Bostonian for several blocks -- who must have identified me through our covert system of signals. He was mostly bemused by the Democrats' primetime speakers and told me he used to be an independent, but for the last 20 years found himself voting mostly Republican. Then he corrected himself and said he votes for the American.

I'd say I love all these Democrats in Boston so much I want them to go home, but I don't. I want Americans to get a good long look at the French Party and keep the 7-11 challenge in mind.

andypanda · Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 354 Location: Santa Fe, NM

It's arguable that Alan Dershowitz' reverence for his beloved law has rendered the American justice system impotent and the American jury system incapable of rendering a verdict.

I'm sure that wasn't Professor Dershowitz' intent, but the paradoxes so obvious in law, in journalism, in almost all the major social constructs of our lives, have enabled and empowered Ann Coulter and others like her, to become the embodiment of these paradoxes, a smiling, charming, witty, attractive Medusa, a telegenic motormouth spouting insanity and true evil.

As a result, there are many among us who now believe all bets are off, the inmates run the asylum, the rule of law doesn't apply, the majority vote does not win. We know this because Bush is President, the Bin Laden family was quietly escorted from the country after the most egregious act of terror in U.S. history, O.J. is free, and most of America is watching so-called reality television.

As for the Carter comment, Coulter's selective memory blames him for the country's involvment in the Middle East. In the large, Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign is a more likely culprit, hence the so-called October Surprise negotiated in Paris largely by the oil industry. "In the beginning, there was George Schulz and Bechtel, and now it's Dick Cheney & Halliburton. ..." yada, yada.

Even that seems a little too presumptuous. The U.S. has only been around for 240 years, and as near as anybody can tell, the Middle East has been grinding out madmen for well over 2000 years.

So, if Vice President Chaney can line his pockets from the same coffers as the afore-mentioned Bin-Laden family, O.J. can play golf, Alan Dershowitz is still the darling of the ACLU, and you, Annie-poo, are still the media darling of the insane right, how about a little bit of insane self-indulgence for me?

My work involves medicine, among other sciences, and medical research at this time involves the experimentation on and extinction of living creatures - not by necessity, but by choice.

So, if those of us of a liberal bent are Nazis, maybe it's time we acted like them, huh? Whaddya think, guys? Maybe bring Ann down to my place, a little exposure to Marburg or Ebola, film it ... a nice, liberal, Nazi reality tv show? Ten days to live, 24 hours a day, hell, that's good for 11 seasons or so, I'd say, unless Dershowitz comes down and pleads her out ...

God, I just realized it, he would, wouldn't he?

rebolpuppy · Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:35 pm Post subject: Resent much?

Wow, Andy!

I thought in AA, when you had a resentment against somebody, you were supposed to pray for them?

andypanda · Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 354 Location: Santa Fe, NM

Sorry, Suze, you're right, of course.

After all, Ann's had it rough, especially since Jeffery Dahmer was offed mysteriously after all the fine service work he did in Milwaukee.

rebolpuppy · Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:56 pm Post subject: Zinger!

Hmm, it looks like you got to her, though. Headline News says she went nuts during her act at Sea World ... she seems to have put on a pound or two, huh?

1carol · Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Posts: 1049 Location: Phoenix AZ

I personally am so insulted by that venom coming from Medusa that I'm afraid if I start in on her I may not stop. I'm normally a caring easy going kind of person, but that woman brings out feelings of hate in me that are almost physical. It's a good thing she's far away or I might do something I'd regret.
Quote: Spawn of Satan!
What comes to my mind is "Beware the false prophet"

Quote: Corn fed, no makeup, natural fiber, no bra needing, sandal wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic Convention
Since I'm from the "flower children hippie chicks" generation. Do you think she must be speaking of me? To those who know me, is she right?
OK...... I love carbs, hate makeup (my flaws force me to wear it),if it needs ironing - don't buy it, wish I "needed" a bra, don't like shoes of any kind (even sandals), keep my mustache shaved, and she must be referring to my chanel #5. Pie wagon? Did someone mention food?

emibaby · Joined: 09 Jun 2004 Posts: 231 Location: Thomasville, AL

1carol wrote: I personally am so insulted by that venom coming from Medusa that I'm afraid if I start in on her I may not stop. I'm normally a caring easy going kind of person, but that woman brings out feelings of hate in me that are almost physical. It's a good thing she's far away or I might do something I'd regret.
Quote: Spawn of Satan!
What comes to my mind is "Beware the false prophet"

Quote: Corn fed, no makeup, natural fiber, no bra needing, sandal wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic Convention
Since I'm from the "flower children hippie chicks" generation. Do you think she must be speaking of me? To those who know me, is she right?
OK...... I love carbs, hate makeup (my flaws force me to wear it),if it needs ironing - don't buy it, wish I "needed" a bra, don't like shoes of any kind (even sandals), keep my mustache shaved, and she must be referring to my chanel #5. Pie wagon? Did someone mention food?

*HUG* You are so great! I won't comment on the article. It's just not worth my time. And she BETTER NOT be talking about Mom Carol!!!!!

andypanda · Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 354 Location: Santa Fe, NM

For those of you who think the word 'conservative' has been hijacked by the criminally insane, Ladies & Gentlemen, I give you the very beautiful and talented Ann Coulter, the Extreme Right's answer to Ru'Paul ...

(This is actually lifted from the Washington Monthly Website.) For the record, I consider myself a Libertarian in the classic sense of the word, not in the Coulter/Larouche sense of the word. We believe in significantly less government in our day-to-day lives, ergo less intrusion into our personal lives. Ms. Coulter's brand of fascism has nothing to do with Libertarianism and everything to do with the sickest form of showbusiness, would you give it up please for "Ilse, She-Wolf of Belsen, Part 2004, She's Still Alive!"

After the September 11 attack masterminded by a terrorist hoping to spark a religious war, virtually every official and pundit knew better than to take the bait. Except for conservative commentator Ann Coulter, who wrote in a syndicated column on September 12 that in responding to terrorists "we should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

The column outraged the public, but conservatives, including National Review editor Richard Lowry, ascribed Coulter's column to grief over the loss of a friend in the attacks. But the following week, Coulter was at it again: "Congress could pass a law tomorrow requiring that all aliens from Arabic countries leave....We should require passports to fly domestically. Passports can be forged, but they can also be checked with the home country in case of any suspicious-looking swarthy males." This time Lowry spiked her column. Coulter responded by calling Lowry and his staff censorious "girly boys." Lowry then dropped her as a contributing editor. Other conservative leaders also condemned her comments.

What's curious is that Coulter's comments aren't all that different, in tone and style, from hundreds of others she's made over the years. But in the past, her ire was directed at her domestic political enemies---for which she drew fulsome praise from conservatives. Last year, the Media Research Center presented Coulter with its "Conservative Journalist of the Year" award. The Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute bestowed upon her its annual conservative leadership award "for her unfailing dedication to truth, freedom and conservative values and for being an exemplar, in word and deed, of what a true leader is."

Coulter is spinning her downfall as a new kind of terrorist-war McCarthyism. "People are hysterical about speech right now," she told The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz. "Everyone's comments are being taken out of context and wildly misinterpreted." At the risk of further de-contextualization, here are some of Coulter's past comments:

"[Clinton] masturbates in the sinks."---Rivera Live 8/2/99

"God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, 'Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.'"---Hannity & Colmes, 6/20/01

The "backbone of the Democratic Party" is a "typical fat, implacable welfare recipient"---syndicated column 10/29/99

To a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."---MSNBC

"Women like Pamela Harriman and Patricia Duff are basically Anna Nicole Smith from the waist down. Let's just call it for what it is. They're whores."---Salon.com 11/16/00

Juan Gonzales is "Cuba's answer to Joey Buttafuoco," a "miscreant," "sperm-donor," and a "poor man's Hugh Hefner."---Rivera Live 5/1/00

On Princess Diana's death: "Her children knew she's sleeping with all these men. That just seems to me, it's the definition of 'not a good mother.' ... Is everyone just saying here that it's okay to ostentatiously have premarital sex in front of your children?"..."[Diana is] an ordinary and pathetic and confessional - I've never had bulimia! I've never had an affair! I've never had a divorce! So I don't think she's better than I am."---MSNBC 9/12/97

"I think there should be a literacy test and a poll tax for people to vote."---Hannity & Colmes, 8/17/99

"I think [women] should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote."---Politically Incorrect, 2/26/01

"If you don't hate Clinton and the people who labored to keep him in office, you don't love your country."---George, 7/99

"We're now at the point that it's beyond whether or not this guy is a horny hick. I really think it's a question of his mental stability. He really could be a lunatic. I think it is a rational question for Americans to ask whether their president is insane."---Equal Time

"It's enough [to be impeached] for the president to be a pervert."---The Case Against Bill Clinton, Coulter's 1998 book.

"Clinton is in love with the erect penis."---This Evening with Judith Regan, Fox News Channel 2/6/00

"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal...[The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."---Politically Incorrect 5/7/97

"If they have the one innocent person who has ever to be put to death this century out of over 7,000, you probably will get a good movie deal out of it."---MSNBC 7/27/97

"If those kids had been carrying guns they would have gunned down this one [child] gunman. ... Don't pray. Learn to use guns."---Politically Incorrect, 12/18/97

"The presumption of innocence only means you don't go right to jail."---Hannity & Colmes 8/24/01

"I have to say I'm all for public flogging. One type of criminal that a public humiliation might work particularly well with are the juvenile delinquents, a lot of whom consider it a badge of honor to be sent to juvenile detention. And it might not be such a cool thing in the 'hood to be flogged publicly."---MSNBC 3/22/97

"Originally, I was the only female with long blonde hair. Now, they all have long blonde hair."---CapitolHillBlue.com 6/6/00

"I am emboldened by my looks to say things Republican men wouldn't."---TV Guide 8/97

"Let's say I go out every night, I meet a guy and have sex with him. Good for me. I'm not married."---Rivera Live 6/7/00

"Anorexics never have boyfriends. ... That's one way to know you don't have anorexia, if you have a boyfriend."---Politically Incorrect 7/21/97

"I think [Whitewater]'s going to prevent the First Lady from running for Senate."---Rivera Live 3/12/99

"My track record is pretty good on predictions."---Rivera Live 12/8/98

"The thing I like about Bush is I think he hates liberals."---Washington Post 8/1/00

On Rep. Christopher Shays (d-CT) in deciding whether to run against him as a Libertarian candidate: "I really want to hurt him. I want him to feel pain."---Hartford Courant 6/25/99

"The swing voters---I like to refer to them as the idiot voters because they don't have set philosophical principles. You're either a liberal or you're a conservative if you have an IQ above a toaster. "---Beyond the News, Fox News Channel, 6/4/00

"My libertarian friends are probably getting a little upset now but I think that's because they never appreciate the benefits of local fascism."---MSNBC 2/8/97

"You want to be careful not to become just a blowhard."---Washington Post 10/16/98

rebolpuppy · Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 7:36 am Post subject: Hypocrite

Andy, I'm sorry for airing all our dirty laundry in public, but I just think you're still bitter she dumped you for me three years ago.

I'm sorry, but all that tongue wagging gives her certain ... uhhh ... strength advantages, and 14 was a very impressionable time for me.

:)

Ms. RP is - of course - preparing a tell-all book about the scandalous affair from which she hopes to raise enough money to have Ann Coulter framed and executed for a crime she didn't commit.

By the way, the whole Coulter-Aileen Wuournos affair never happened quite the way it's been alleged ... Ann just got *really* excited and mixed up when she found out Charlize Theron wanted the part ...